| Jul. 3rd, 2008 @ 08:40 pm Obama on abortion - again. |
|---|
Obama never fails to disappoint. On the heels of his much appreciated view of the California constitutional amendment, he goes back to being the panderer that he is. In an effort to reach out to evangelicals (remember, the new Democrat base?), Obama states that mental distress is no reason to allow a late-term abortion.
In an interview this week with "Relevant," a Christian magazine, Obama said prohibitions on late-term abortions must contain "a strict, well defined exception for the health of the mother."
Obama then added: "Now, I don't think that 'mental distress' qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term." Apparently, unless there is a serious physical issue, Obama is against late-term abortions, never mind the mental health of the mother.
Roe v. Wade's position on abortion -
medical judgments about the need for an abortion could include physical, emotional and psychological health factors.
Remember NARAL - the organization that endorsed Obama when Clinton was still in the running? Here's their position:
"A health exception must also account for the mental health problems that may occur in pregnancy. Severe fetal anomalies, for example, can exact a tremendous emotional toll on a pregnant woman and her family." So what do they have to say about Obama's position now? They're still defending him -
In a statement, NARAL Pro-Choice said Obama's magazine interview is consistent with Roe v. Wade.
"Sen. Obama has consistently said he supports the tenets set forth by Roe, and has made strong statements against President Bush's Federal Abortion Ban, which does not have an exception to protect a woman's health," the organization's statement said. Yes, only he's limiting health to physical health while Roe v. Wade includes psychological and emotional effects, or did they miss that?
David N. O'Steen, the executive director of National Right to Life, said Obama's remarks to the magazine "are either quite disingenuous or they reflect that Obama does not know what he is talking about."
"You cannot believe that abortion should not be allowed for mental health reasons and support Roe v Wade," O'Steen said.
So what was that about women having to vote for Obama because of Roe v. Wade? First women should consult with their pastors before deciding on an abortion and now this. Sure, he's for abortion, but it's such wishy-washy support that it's hard to believe he'd do much to actually protect the right. |